PECULIARITIES OF MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE INTERPRETATION IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARATION FOR THE FUTURE DOCTOR

Abstract

The article considers the process of training future doctors in the context of medical knowledge, as a partial category in the general philosophical category of knowledge. Emphasis is placed on the peculiarities of the education for the future physician, who must understand humans from the standpoint of a holistic, universal, general doctrine of humanity, as the unity of biological and social, somatic and mental, objective and subjective components. It is proved that this explains the specifics of medical knowledge, which is determined by the variety of cognitive demands of medicine and extends from the molecular level of human morphophysiology to the social, psychological patterns in human society. The reasons are proven, that the differentiation of medicine into narrow specialties leads to the fact that there are problems in establishing a clinical diagnosis from a set of disparate facts. This usually explains the inability of the practitioner to think creatively, using methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, the method of comparison, the separation of the individual from the general. It was found that medical knowledge, which is based on the general principles of knowledge, has an integrated nature of knowledge, focus on pathology, emphasis on the individual, inseparable link with medical practice, interdisciplinary and activity nature, constructiveness. It is established that there is an inseparable unity between the object and the subject of medical knowledge, but not only on the basis of disciplinary identity but also on the basis of a comprehensive study of the object in favor of medical knowledge. The study of philosophy should have a clinical focus that will be widely illustrated with concrete examples and predict quality medical knowledge, as a result of medical knowledge. The scientific and theoretical thinking of the physician is based on clinical thinking but is not reduced to it, and in addition, contains specific features inherent in general scientific knowledge. Such thinking is associated with the discovery of new facts, patterns, theories that reveal the course of a particular pathological process, knowledge of certain nosological units (both new and old), which is a pressing problem in modern science and requires detailed methodological justification.